Difference between revisions of "BetaFn"
m (adding doc status category stub page) |
(Relationship to the GammaFn) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[category:Analytic Distribution Functions]] | [[category:Analytic Distribution Functions]] | ||
− | [[Category:Doc Status | + | [[Category:Doc Status C]] <!-- For Lumina use, do not change --> |
− | {{ | + | == BetaFn(a, b) == |
+ | The complete [[beta]] function, defined as: | ||
+ | :<math>BetaFn(a,b) = \int_0^1 x^{a-1} (1-x)^{b-1} dx</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following relationship exists between the [[BetaFn]] and the [[GammaFn]]: | ||
+ | :[[BetaFn]](a,b) = [[GammaFn]](a) * [[GammaFn]](b) / [[GammaFn]](a+b) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Numeric considerations == | ||
+ | |||
+ | For very large values of <code>a</code> and <code>b</code>, the result underflow, so that you might find it better to use <code>[[Ln]]([[BetaFn]](a,b))</code>. However, when computing the log-beta function, you should compute it using: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<code>[[LGamma]](a) + [[LGamma]](b) - [[LGamma]](a+b)</code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == See Also == | ||
+ | * [[Beta]] | ||
+ | * [[BetaI]] : The incomplete beta function | ||
+ | * [[GammaFn]] : The complete gamma function | ||
+ | * [[Parametric continuous distributions]] | ||
+ | * [[Distribution Densities Library]] |
Latest revision as of 21:23, 5 February 2016
BetaFn(a, b)
The complete beta function, defined as:
- [math]\displaystyle{ BetaFn(a,b) = \int_0^1 x^{a-1} (1-x)^{b-1} dx }[/math]
The following relationship exists between the BetaFn and the GammaFn:
Numeric considerations
For very large values of a
and b
, the result underflow, so that you might find it better to use Ln(BetaFn(a,b))
. However, when computing the log-beta function, you should compute it using:
See Also
- Beta
- BetaI : The incomplete beta function
- GammaFn : The complete gamma function
- Parametric continuous distributions
- Distribution Densities Library
Comments
Enable comment auto-refresher